欢迎访问瑞昌明盛自动化设备有限公司官网!
关于我们 | 联系我们

+86 15270269218

您的位置:首页>>产品中心 >> foxboro

1769-IF4I模块备件

型号: 1769-IF4I  分类: foxboro
  • 1769-IF4I
  • 1769-IF4I
  • 1769-IF4I
  • 1769-IF4I


1769-IF4I

外部审计师直接执行或使用内部审计程序的范围
提供直接协助的审计员包括:
(a) 确定是内部审计职能部门的工作还是内部审计部门的直接协助
可以使用审计师,如果可以,在哪些领域以及在多大程度上使用审计师;
并且在作出该确定之后:
(b) 如果使用内部审计职能部门的工作,确定该工作是否足以:
审计目的;和
(c) 如果使用内部审计师提供直接协助,则适当指导、监督和
回顾他们的工作。
定义
14.就《国际审计准则》而言,以下术语的含义如下:
(a) 内部审计职能——执行保证和咨询的实体的职能
旨在评估和提高实体治理、风险和风险的有效性的活动
管理和内部控制流程。(参考:第A1-A4段)
(b) 直接协助——利用内部审计师执行《审计准则》下的审计程序
指导、监督和审查外聘审计员。
要求
确定内部审计职能是否、在哪些领域以及在多大程度上开展工作
可以使用
评价内部审计职能
15.外聘审计员应确定内部审计职能部门的工作是否可用于:
通过评估以下内容实现审计目的:
(a) 内部审计职能部门的组织地位和相关政策
程序支持内部审计师的客观性;(参考:第A5-A9段)
(b) 内部审计职能的能力水平;和(参考:第A5-A9段)
(c) 内部审计职能部门是否采用了系统和严格的方法,包括:
质量控制(参考:第A10-A11段)
16.如果外聘审计员:
确定:
(a) 该职能的组织地位和相关政策和程序不充分
支持内部审计师的客观性;
(b) 该职能部门缺乏足够的能力;或
(c) 该职能部门没有采用系统和严格的方法,包括质量控制。
(参考:第A12-A14段)
ISA 610(2013年修订版),使用内部审计师的工作
7.
确定可使用的内部审计职能的工作性质和范围
17.作为确定内部审计职能领域和范围的基础
外聘审计员应考虑已完成工作的性质和范围
由内部审计职能部门执行或计划执行,及其与
外聘审计员的总体审计战略和审计计划。(参考:第A15-A17段)
18.外聘审计员应在审计业务中作出所有重大判断,并防止:
不当使用内部审计职能的工作,应计划减少使用该职能的工作
并直接执行更多工作:(参考:第A15-A17段)
(a) 在以下方面涉及的判断越多:
(i) 规划和执行相关审计程序;和
(ii)评估收集的审计证据;(参考:第A18-A19段)
(b) 断言级别的重大错报评估风险越高,特别是:
考虑确定为重大的风险;(参考:第A20-A22段)
(c) 内部审计职能部门的组织地位和相关政策和建议越少
程序充分支持内部审计师的客观性;和
(d) 内部审计职能的能力水平越低。
19.外聘审计员还应评估总体上是否使用了内部审计工作
在计划范围内的职能仍将导致外聘审计员充分参与
鉴于外聘审计员对所发表的审计意见负有全部责任,审计工作将继续进行。(参考:第。
A15–A22)
20.外聘审计员在与治理层沟通时,应概述以下内容:
根据ISA 260.7规定的计划审计范围和时间安排
沟通如何
外聘审计员计划利用内部审计职能部门的工作。(参考:第A23段)
利用内部审计职能部门的工作
21.如果外聘审计员计划利用内部审计职能部门的工作,外聘审计员应:
与职能部门讨论其工作的计划使用,作为协调各自工作的基础
活动。(参考:第A24-A26段)
22.外聘审计员应阅读与审计委员会工作有关的内部审计职能报告
外聘审计员计划使用的职能,以了解审计的性质和范围
其执行的审计程序和相关发现。
23.外聘审计员应对内部审计的工作主体执行充分的审计程序
作为一个整体,外部审计师计划使用该功能来确定其在以下方面的充分性:
审计,包括eva

1769-IF4I

1769-IF4I模块备件

1769-IF4I

extent, of audit procedures to be performed directly by the external auditor, or to use internal auditors to provide direct assistance, are: (a) To determine whether the work of the internal audit function or direct assistance from internal auditors can be used, and if so, in which areas and to what extent; and having made that determination: (b) If using the work of the internal audit function, to determine whether that work is adequate for purposes of the audit; and (c) If using internal auditors to provide direct assistance, to appropriately direct, supervise and review their work. Definitions 14. For purposes of the ISAs, the following terms have the meanings attributed below: (a) Internal audit function – A function of an entity that performs assurance and consulting activities designed to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of the entity’s governance, risk management and internal control processes. (Ref: Para. A1–A4) (b) Direct assistance – The use of internal auditors to perform audit procedures under the direction, supervision and review of the external auditor. Requirements Determining Whether, in Which Areas, and to What Extent the Work of the Internal Audit Function Can Be Used Evaluating the Internal Audit Function 15. The external auditor shall determine whether the work of the internal audit function can be used for purposes of the audit by evaluating the following: (a) The extent to which the internal audit function’s organizational status and relevant policies and procedures support the objectivity of the internal auditors; (Ref: Para. A5–A9) (b) The level of competence of the internal audit function; and (Ref: Para. A5–A9) (c) Whether the internal audit function applies a systematic and disciplined approach, including quality control. (Ref: Para. A10–A11) 16. The external auditor shall not use the work of the internal audit function if the external auditor determines that: (a) The function’s organizational status and relevant policies and procedures do not adequately support the objectivity of internal auditors; (b) The function lacks sufficient competence; or (c) The function does not apply a systematic and disciplined approach, including quality control. (Ref: Para. A12–A14) ISA 610 (REVISED 2013), USING THE WORK OF INTERNAL AUDITORS 7 Determining the Nature and Extent of Work of the Internal Audit Function that Can Be Used 17. As a basis for determining the areas and the extent to which the work of the internal audit function can be used, the external auditor shall consider the nature and scope of the work that has been performed, or is planned to be performed, by the internal audit function and its relevance to the external auditor’s overall audit strategy and audit plan. (Ref: Para. A15–A17) 18. The external auditor shall make all significant judgments in the audit engagement and, to prevent undue use of the work of the internal audit function, shall plan to use less of the work of the function and perform more of the work directly: (Ref: Para. A15–A17) (a) The more judgment is involved in: (i) Planning and performing relevant audit procedures; and (ii) Evaluating the audit evidence gathered; (Ref: Para. A18–A19) (b) The higher the assessed risk of material misstatement at the assertion level, with special consideration given to risks identified as significant; (Ref: Para. A20–A22) (c) The less the internal audit function’s organizational status and relevant policies and procedures adequately support the objectivity of the internal auditors; and (d) The lower the level of competence of the internal audit function. 19. The external auditor shall also evaluate whether, in aggregate, using the work of the internal audit function to the extent planned would still result in the external auditor being sufficiently involved in the audit, given the external auditor’s sole responsibility for the audit opinion expressed. (Ref: Para. A15–A22) 20. The external auditor shall, in communicating with those charged with governance an overview of the planned scope and timing of the audit in accordance with ISA 260,7 communicate how the external auditor has planned to use the work of the internal audit function. (Ref: Para. A23) Using the Work of the Internal Audit Function 21. If the external auditor plans to use the work of the internal audit function, the external auditor shall discuss the planned use of its work with the function as a basis for coordinating their respective activities. (Ref: Para. A24–A26) 22. The external auditor shall read the reports of the internal audit function relating to the work of the function that the external auditor plans to use to obtain an understanding of the nature and extent of audit procedures it performed and the related findings. 23. The external auditor shall perform sufficient audit procedures on the body of work of the internal audit function as a whole that the external auditor plans to use to determine its adequacy for purposes of the audit, including evaluating whether: (a) The work of the function had been properly planned, performed, supervised, reviewed and documented; (b) Sufficient appropriate evidence had been obtained to enable the function to draw reasonable conclusions; and 7 ISA 260, Communication with Those Charged with Governance, paragraph 15 ISA 610 (REVISED 2013), USING THE WORK OF INTERNAL AUDITORS 8 (c) Conclusions reached are appropriate in the circumstances and the reports prepared by the function are consistent with the results of the work performed. (Ref: Para. A27–A30) 24. The nature and extent of the external auditor’s audit procedures shall be responsive to the external auditor’s evaluation of: (a) The amount of judgment involved; (b) The assessed risk of material misstatement; (c) The extent to which the internal audit function’s organizational status and relevant policies and procedures support the objectivity of the internal auditors; and (d) The level of competence of the function;8 (Ref: Para. A27–A29) and shall include reperformance of some of the work. (Ref: Para. A30) 25. The external auditor shall also evaluate whether the external auditor’s conclusions regarding the internal audit function in paragraph 15 of this ISA and the determination of the nature and extent of use of the work of the functio



更多
查看更多 >>

推荐产品