BAMU-11 3AUA0000109935 驱动器 斯诺尔

BAMU-11 3AUA0000109935 驱动器 斯诺尔 

能力数据组提供有关活动收集和集成的信息
它们结合起来响应特定要求。此处定义的能力是
在规定的标准和条件下，通过以下方式实现预期效果的能力：
执行一组任务的手段和方法的组合。“这一定义符合
包含在联合参谋部发布的JCIDS指令中。
数据组描述
包含能力的数据的DoDAF元模型如下图所示。项目
值得注意的是：
a、 方法和手段用DM2语言解释为资源和活动
b、 因为期望的效果是资源的期望状态（参见目标数据组），所以
能力是关于以下状态（当前状态的持续性，或未来状态的变化）
资源。
c、 能力通过其所涉及的活动和
寻求期望的效果。
d、 能力通过执行者实现的能力与服务相关：
是服务。通常，服务不会提供期望的效果，
获得可能的方式和方法（活动和资源）。
DoDAF能力元模型
出身背景
建筑发展
元模型
概念的
必然的
表演者
资源流动
信息和数据
规则
目标
能力
服务
项目
物化
组织结构
措施
位置
纯种
PES
思想基金会
本体论
观点和模型
展示技巧
配置管理
概述
缩略语列表和词汇表
术语
网站地图
档案
国防部
62
DM2-能力
http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/capability_mm.html[2011年3月3日下午3:43:27]
（点击图片放大）
核心流程中的使用
能力数据用于描述能力；定义获取和开发
提供所需能力所需的要求；促进理解
执行能力；开发/更新/改进理论和教材，以支持
能力执行；并促进数据的共享和重用。
能力数据组（CDG）具有不同级别的表示，从企业
解决方案级别，适用于所有国防部核心流程。这包括企业目标
与总体愿景相关，为能力提供战略背景
由体系结构和伴随的范围描述，比
作战概念图中定义的基于场景的范围。在这个级别上，CDG
支持对决策者上下文中可使用的功能进行描述
用于传达关于能力发展的战略愿景。a中考虑的因素
基于能力的分析包括：
a、 学说
b、 组织
c、 训练
d、 物资
e、 领导和教育
f、 人员
g、 设施
以下章节记录了能力数据组和DM2如何支持分析
这些因素中的每一个。
在联合出版物1-02《军事和相关术语词典》中，条令定义为
“军队或其组成部分指导其行动的基本原则
支持国家目标。它具有权威性，但在应用中需要判断。”
应用中所需的判断概念涉及决策，不能
建模，但可能作为影响其他规则适用性的规则除外。零件
可建模的条令包括在能力数据组中，如下所示：
a、 原则被建模为规则。
b、 军事力量及其要素建模为以下类型和组件：
表演者。
c、 动作被建模为活动

BAMU-11 3AUA0000109935 驱动器 斯诺尔 

BAMU-11 3AUA0000109935 驱动器 斯诺尔 

The Capability Data Group provides information on the collection and integration of activities
that combine to respond to a specific requirement. A capability, as defined here is "the
ability to achieve a desired effect under specified standards and conditions through
combinations of means and ways to perform a set of tasks." This definition is consistent with
that contained in the JCIDS Instruction published by the Joint Staff.
Data Group Description
The DoDAF Meta Model for the data comprising Capability is shown in the figure below. Items
of note:
a. Ways and means are interpreted in DM2 language to be Resources and Activities
b. Because a Desired Effect is a desired state of a Resource (see Goals data group), a
Capability is about states (persistence of current ones, or changes to future ones) of
Resources.
c. Capabilities link to Measures (Metrics) through the Activities they entail and the
Desired Effects sought.
d. Capabilities relate to Services via the realization of the Capability by a Performer that
is a Service. In general, a Service would not provide the Desired Effect(s) but, rather,
access to ways and means (Activities and Resources) that would.
DoDAF Meta Model for Capability
Background
Architecture Development
Meta-Model
Conceptual
Logical
Performers
Resource Flows
Information and Data
Rules
Goals
Capability
Services
Project
Reification
Organizational Structure
Measures
Locations
Pedigree
PES
IDEAS Foundation
Ontology
Viewpoints & Models
Presentation Techniques
Configuration Management
Overview
Acronyms List and Glossary
of Terms
Site Map
Archives
Department of Defense
62
DM2 - Capability
http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/capability_mm.html[3/3/2011 3:43:27 PM]
(Click image to enlarge)
Usage in Core Processes
Data for Capabilities are used to describe the capability; define acquisition and development
requirements necessary to provide the required capability; facilitate understanding of
capability execution; develop/update/improve doctrine and educational materials in support
of capability execution; and to facilitate sharing and reuse of data.
The Capabilities Data Group (CDG) has a representation at varying levels, from enterprise
level to solutions and applies to all DoD core processes. This includes enterprise goals
associated with the overall vision, that provide a strategic context for the capabilities
described by an architecture, and an accompanying high-level scope, more general than the
scenario-based scope defined in an operational concept diagram. At this level, the CDG
enables a high-level description of capabilities in decision-makers contexts that can be used
for communicating a strategic vision regarding capability evolution. Factors considered in a
Capability Based Analysis are:
a. Doctrine
b. Organizations
c. Training
d. Materiel
e. Leadership and Education
f. Personnel
g. Facilities
The following sections document how the Capability Data Group and DM2 support analysis of
each of these factors.
In Joint Pub 1-02, Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, doctrine is defined as
"Fundamental principles by which the military forces or elements thereof guide their actions
in support of national objectives. It is authoritative but requires judgment in application."
The concept of judgment required in application deals with decision making and cannot be
precisely modeled except perhaps as rules affecting the applicability of other rules. The parts
of doctrine that can be modeled are included in the capability data group as follows:
a. Principles are modeled as Rules.
b. Military forces and elements thereof are modeled as types and assemblies of
Performers.
c. Actions are modeled as Activities